Discussion and Debate>
Nutcakes attempting to export poison to UK
Join in on a strand below or start a new strand.
me.

1246 post s
23-Jun-2007
6:47 AM
LONDON (Reuters) - A teenage schoolgirl will appeal to the High Court on Friday to overturn a ban on her wearing a "purity ring" at school to symbolize her decision to abstain from sex before marriage.

(Advertisement)
Lydia Playfoot, 16, from West Sussex, says the silver ring is an expression of her faith and should be exempt from the school's rules on wearing jewellery.

"It is really important to me because in the Bible it says we should do this," she told BBC radio. "Muslims are allowed to wear headscarves and other faiths can wear bangles and other types of jewellery. It feels like Christians are being discriminated against."

Playfoot's lawyers will argue that her right to express religious belief is upheld by the Human Rights Act.

There have been a series of rows in schools in recent years over the right of pupils to wear religious symbols or clothing, such as crucifixes and veils.

Last year, the Law Lords rejected Shabina Begum's appeal for permission to wear a Muslim gown at her school in Luton. That case echoed a debate in France over the banning of Muslim headscarves in state schools.

Lydia Playfoot's parents help run the British arm of the American campaign group the Silver Ring Thing, which promotes abstinence among young people.

Members wear a ring on the third finger of the left hand. It is inscribed with "Thess. 4:3-4," a reference to a Biblical passage from Thessalonians which reads: "God wants you to be holy, so you should keep clear of all sexual sin."

Lydia's father, Phil Playfoot, said his daughter's case was part of a wider cultural trend towards Christians being "silenced."

"What I would describe as a secular fundamentalism is coming to the fore, which really wants to silence certain beliefs, and Christian views in particular," he said.

Leon Nettley, head teacher of Millais School in Horsham, denies discrimination, saying the ring contravenes the school's rules on wearing jewellery.

"The school is not convinced pupils' rights have been interfered with by the application of the uniform policy," he told the Brighton-based Argus newspaper. "The school has a clearly published uniform policy and sets high standards."

me.

1247 post s
23-Jun-2007
6:48 AM
Apparently, in a survey conducted on these sad desperate geeks in america, most of them are having sex anyway.

And because they've had no sex-education, they don't use condoms. Oh, well done!

Apparently, they all take it up the arse to avoid getting pregnant!

I ain't foolin'!

It says nowhere in the bible that christians have to wear silver rings. Just as it says nowhere that muslim girls should cover the face. But it does say to cover the hair.
So most schools allow headscarves, but not veils or rings.

AND why should they?

What if I want to wear inverted crosses, and T-shirts with Cannibal Corpse "She was asking for it" to symbolise satanic beliefs, do you think the religious schools would tolerate these 'symbols of belief'?

Last Edited on 23-Jun-2007 6:53 AM

jopaku

241 post s
23-Jun-2007
12:00 PM
Silver ringed, bible thumping, teenage girls, that engage in anal intercourse?

Did I ever say that you had no imagination?
I take it back.

me.

1249 post s
25-Jun-2007
4:07 AM
Sure, it was on one of louis theroux's documentaries- he's a trusted BBC journalist - Jb probably knows who I mean.

And- good for them- I bet they enjoy it! It's just a shame you have to be hypocrites in order to have some fun...

What a bunch of geeky losers these poor kids will become though... Can you imagine their wedding night? Disaster.

Last Edited on 25-Jun-2007 4:11 AM

 

Powered by CityMax.com